I think the difference is transmitted rather than reflected light. A
large monitor looks very good too.
Chuck Norcutt
C.H.Ling wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Dacey"
>
>> With a slide you get a really good d-max in the super black blacks
>> the slide film will produce, and in the same shot you can also have
>> clear film base d-min, that's a pretty large dynamic range.
>>
>> But in terms of exposure, you're going to hit those brick walls of d-
>> min and d-max reasonably quickly (and a lot less quickly than with
>> print film). I think that's part of the look of slide film and part
>> of why it looks so good (when done properly), you're essentially
>> expanding the dynamic range of the scene when you capture it on film.
>
> I'm not sure, I believe why slides look so good because it resemble what we
> see so it is neither expanding nor compressing the scene (except at extreme
> ends which are out of slide's capture range), that's why it look so 'real'.
>
> C.H.Ling - looking at some slides and doing wild guessing.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|