Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] ISO may not be accurate

Subject: Re: [OM] ISO may not be accurate
From: Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:00:55 +1100



> Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> That's interesting.  DPReview has been reporting actual ISO test results 
> 
> for a long time.  DXO says the Canon 5D's ISO 100 is actually 92. 
> DPreview reported it as 125.  And, of course, Canons says it's 100. 
> Who's right?  I doesn't make any difference until I have to get out the 
> external meter for flash.
> 

A couple of points:

What was the actual film speed of Kodak Portra 400 ?
Would anyone really notice if it was 380 or 420 ?
How much variation is there from batch to batch ?
Is there an actual ISO standard for measuring the "speed" of a digital camera ? 
 There is for film, but since the "characteristic curve" (from which the film 
speed is measured) is different for film and digital I doubt you can just 
directly apply the film standard to a digital sensor.

...Wayne

Wayne Harridge

http://lrh.structuregraphs.com
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz