Am I right in thinking, Joel, that these settings matter only for non-
RAW capture?
Chris
On 8 Feb 2009, at 13:13, Joel Wilcox wrote:
>
> I managed a few shots late yesterday afternoon with the E-3 using the
> VIVID setting. It's not really vivid as in Velvia vivid, but it
> brings one more within range of the CS2 setting on the E-1. The danger
> at all times with the E-3 seems to me to be over-saturation of blue.
> I like its rendering of blue iniitially, but any further increase in
> overall saturation tends to overdo the blue. Sometimes the remedy is
> to saturate generally, and then select blues and desaturate them back
> to what they were.
>
> Interestingly, though I was shooting at magic hour, Auto WB put the
> color temp at 4900. If I change it to 5300 (daylight) in LR, it seems
> less accurate in a way such that I tend to prefer what I saw with Auto
> WB. This is weird to me and quite different from the E-1. Overall,
> the E-3 seems more accurate than the E-1, which is not to say it is
> necessarily more pleasing by that fact. There is somewhat more to
> choose from in settings as well.
>
> I'm interested in what others are using as their standard settings
> on the E-3.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|