Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] E-3 versus E-1 - pictures better with E-1

Subject: Re: [OM] E-3 versus E-1 - pictures better with E-1
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:51:41 -0500
Yes, indirectly related to focal length since focal ratio is the 
important measure for diffraction.

Chuck Norcutt

C.H.Ling wrote:
> Isn't it the diffraction limit is also related to the lens focal length? As 
> I remember the shorter the lens the faster it reach the diffraction limit. 
> If you have a long lens, you can stop down more before it reach the 
> diffraction limit.
> 
> C.H.Ling
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Chuck Norcutt"
> 
>> It's not the limit of the lens that's in question, only the limit of the
>> lens at a particular aperture.  Small sensors with small pixels run up
>> against the limits of diffraction faster than large sensors with large
>> pixels.  Simple as that.  Diffraction is worse at small apertures.  If
>> you had a 16 MP 4/3 sensor you would not able to shoot at smaller
>> apertures than about f/5.6 in order to reach full resolution at the 
>> sensor.
>>
>> Small sensors can perform but they take high quality lenses that perform
>> well at apertures larger than we are accustomed to in 35mm.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
> 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz