Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] E-3 versus E-1 - pictures better with E-1

Subject: Re: [OM] E-3 versus E-1 - pictures better with E-1
From: "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:11:27 +0800
Thanks for Wayne and Chuck's confirmation, then we may only be able to shoot 
at F4 with the 7-14 at 7mm :-) I would prefer to use my 16mm fisheye with 
OM5D II.

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wayne Harridge"

>
>> C.H.Ling <> wrote:
>>
>> Isn't it the diffraction limit is also related to the lens focal length?
>> As
>> I remember the shorter the lens the faster it reach the diffraction
>> limit.
>> If you have a long lens, you can stop down more before it reach the
>> diffraction limit.
>>
>
> Simplistically, the amount of diffraction is related to the "size of the 
> hole" through which the light passes, so yes a longer lens can be stopped 
> down further than a short lens before it has a diffraction "problem".  A 
> 200mm lens at f16 has an effective aperture of 12.5mm, same as a 50mm lens 
> at f4.
>
> ...Wayne

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz