You are correct, Wayne. That is about what I upload to the LUG gallery.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] E-30
>
>
>
>
>> Chuck Norcutt <> wrote:
>>
>> No need to set resolution when setting pixel dimensions. Resolution is
>> a meaningless number unless accompanied by physical dimensions and, in
>> that case, the two control the pixel dimensions. Without specification
>> of physical dimensions the resolution value is only "advisory" and plays
>>
>> no part in any actual display of the image.
>>
>
> interesting that if you have a screen with 72 ppi and you display your 800
> pixel wide image at that resolution it will be 11.11111111111111111111111
> inches wide on the screen !
>
> ...Wayne
>
> Wayne Harridge
>
> http://lrh.structuregraphs.com
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|