Hello all,
I have not had the opportunity to do my own comparison yet (I know, I
know...
but my enlarger is still broken) and I was wondering, apart from the
obvious
rather significant difference in focal length, at f/8 and infinity,
what would
you gentlemen (and ladies) perceive to be the better performing lens?
I am talking
mostly about resolution, perhaps flare-resistance, and to a lesser
degree contrast
(I do chemical B&W, so I can correct contrast easily enough).
Can the 90/2.0 floating system really enable perfect correction at
infinity (a long
way from the 1/10 life size optimum)?
I need no convincing of the 90/2.0 lens' astounding (really: not
"amazing",
not "freakin amazing", but just downright impossibly good) performance
at
closer distances, but at f/8 @ infinity, compared to the 135/3.5...
What doth thou say?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|