Sandy Harris wrote:
> Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>> ... An A+ grade for centers and corners is set to the performance of a 50mm
>> f/2.0 Zuiko Macro at f/8.*"
>>
>> ... the 50/2 macro, which set the standard for A+.
>>
>
> Is the four thirds 50/2 as good? Would it work well as a general-purpose
> short tele, street shots & portraits?
>
Others here will have opinions about that. I've never owned the OM 50/2,
being perfectly happy with a 50/3.5 for macro and 50/1.4 > 1,085,000 for
te rest. And I've never owned a camera that would take the DZ 50/2.
Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|