Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 90/2 vs 100/2 comparisons, et al

Subject: Re: [OM] 90/2 vs 100/2 comparisons, et al
From: "Sawyer, Edward" <Ed.Sawyer@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:08:02 -0500
Comparing them in the Modern Photography tests, the numbers suggest the
100/2 as the better lens, but only slightly as far as resolution goes.
The contrast numbers on the 100/2 are significantly better, however. I
have these tests (and several other Oly lens tests) posted online for
those that are interested. http://www.edsawyer.com/lenstests/

Count me as one who is glad to see Ritz bite the dust (at least as much
as chapter 11 is biting the dust). They were always clueless wankers in
my experience, who more often then not shot themselves in the foot with
their idiotic choices and behaviour. Good riddance.

-Ed
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [OM] 90/2 vs 100/2 comparisons, et al, Sawyer, Edward <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz