Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape

Subject: Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape
From: Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:37:47 -0600
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Joel owns/has owned like most of the F2 lenses and his 100/2 is really
> really sweet.  The 90/2 was also very nice, but the handling is so
> anti-Zuiko.  It's kinda the Rosanne Barr of lenses.

Dood, I've never even laid eyes on a 100/2!  You're probably thinking
of my Sigma 19-35 zoom (which focuses in the wrong direction).

Rosanne Barr?  You're a sick, sick man.  ;^P

Joel W.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz