On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As both Modern Photography and Gary's test results shown both lenses are
> very compariable. I doubt the extreme comments from these list memebers.
>
> My comment was based on the test shots under modern (digital back)
> controlled condition with very silent shutter and 10x liveview. As the
> difference between the two lenses are so small I doubt people will see it in
> normal use.
One variation on this discussion I recall had to do with whether the
100/2 was too sharp to be suitable for portraiture. In the case of my
face, no lens is quite unsharp enough to suit me.
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|