Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape

Subject: Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape
From: Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:03:13 -0600
>
> One variation on this discussion I recall had to do with whether the
> 100/2 was too sharp to be suitable for portraiture.  In the case of my
> face, no lens is quite unsharp enough to suit me.
>


Joel, it isn't the face that's the problem.  The real problem is that no
polarizing filter removes the glare.  :)

AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz