| Subject: | Re: [OM] Ritz going under |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:30:54 -0600 |
> > Inversely proportional. > Exhibit A: I am well paid... > Exhibit B: I am not well paid... :) AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Ritz going under, Stephen Troy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape, Joel Wilcox |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Ritz going under, Stephen Troy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Ritz going under, Andrew Dacey |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |