Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape

Subject: Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape
From: Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:35:11 -0600
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> One variation on this discussion I recall had to do with whether the
>> 100/2 was too sharp to be suitable for portraiture.  In the case of my
>> face, no lens is quite unsharp enough to suit me.
>>
>
>
> Joel, it isn't the face that's the problem.  The real problem is that no
> polarizing filter removes the glare.  :)
>
> AG

You mean you don't like that?

Joel W.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz