Very nice. #2 is the winner.
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
> Tom Fenwick wrote:
>> I've been using the 35/2 on the canyon in some dark places recently. It's
>> easier to use than the alternatives when you can hardly see:
>>
>> http://www.pbase.com/tom_77/image/110075703
>> http://www.pbase.com/tom_77/image/110138790
>>
>
> Some nice shots there in previously impossible light.
>
> I've been doing some shootin' in low light myself. At least I think 1/40
> sec, ISO 3200, f1.8, EV -2/3 is pretty dim for hand held with moving
> subjects. About EV 1, I think.
>
> The 50/1.8 may be cheap and unimpressively made, but it delivers the
> goods. AF worked well. More to come as I get around to them.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=VisitKirsten/2009_02_21>
>
> Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|