Canon 16-35mm f2.8 - Mk.1 or 2? :-)
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 27/03/2009, at 7:13 PM, Dawid Loubser wrote:
> Since at the time I was using a (exceptionally well-built and pretty)
> Canon 16-35L f/2.8, I scoffed at how pathetic the ZD 9-18 felt, but
> when you see the images... I think the ZD almost matches the
> performance of the L lens at equivalent apertures.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|