It wasn't hard. Just look at the total image height relative to the
size of the people at the table. It had to have been taken very close
to the table and an ultra-wide is the only thing that could take in that
much more of the room.
Chuck Norcutt
C.H.Ling wrote:
> Chuck really has very good eyes, I just can't imagine it is T003, I thought
> it is 1001.
>
> BTW, I really like the people gallery.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Fenwick"
>
>> That's the one - good call. The lens is basically distortion free on
>> the brick wall test, and the corner stretching doesn't really show on
>> landscapes. It's an incredible lens... But I've given all that m stuff
>> up.
>>
>> As I said to someone the other day, I gave up the leica when I saw
>> Philip Perkis' "The Sadness of Men" - the book I was hoping to put
>> together over the next 30 years :-)
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 3 Apr 2009, at 23:21, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>
>>> I assume that it must be T003. But it's a surprise since I expected
>>> distortion that I don't see.
>>>
>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>
>>> Tom Fenwick wrote:
>>>> Thanks Chuck. One of those people photos is through the cv 15mm lens
>>>> being discussed in another thread.
>>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|