OK, I just tried the easy way and (as Walt would have sais) it's way
more better... and better for ya too!
Thanks for the lesson
Chuck Norcutt
Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Guess I'll have to try the simple way too. I'd have never guess it was
> that easy. In the meantime I already redid it the hard way using a mask
> and curves. I guess it wasn't necessary but at least I forced myself to
> learn how to convert selections to masks and to load masks from alpha
> channels into layer masks. That was worth it. :-)
> <http://www.chucknorcutt.com/Mt%20Rainier/index.htm>
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Moose wrote:
>> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>> Thanks. I prefer it too but don't know how you did that.
>>>
>> Image=>Adjust=>Shadow/Highlight=> Shadow Amount = 0, Highlight settings
>> about 35, 30, 20 or to taste. No masks, no tricks, nothing but the one
>> adjustment.
>>
>> Moose
>>
>>> Moose wrote:
>>>
>>>> The clouds look awfully washed out to me. I prefer it with the highlights
>>>> spread out and down a bit.
>>>> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/CNorcutt/ChinookP1.htm>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|