Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] That's Not a Bokeh, This is a Bokeh

Subject: Re: [OM] That's Not a Bokeh, This is a Bokeh
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 17:59:40 -0400
Nope, no LCE.  The only editing tool applied was the cloning tool.

Chuck Norcutt

Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
> Indeed. Saturation increase is more noticeable than contrast increase, 
> but the yellow centre shows as if a LCE would have been applied.
> Will do the same after I finish working to see what I get. Perhaps I'd 
> convert it to .tif, clone out and them back to .jpg. Have seen that in 
> my workflow, while resizing and changing from 16 to 8 bit give different 
> results if I resize o change color depth first.
> 
> Fernando
> 
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> I just noticed that, in a side-by-side comparison, my modified version 
>> seems to have a bit more contrast and saturation than CH's original.  I 
>> don't understand why since I altered nothing except cloning out the 
>> orange and adding a black border for display.  The only other thing I 
>> can think of is re-saving as a JPEG twice but I don't know why that 
>> would change contrast or saturation.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>   
>>> So, I thought I'd show you what I meant.  This is CH's flower sans the 
>>> pesky orange in the background.
>>> <http://www.chucknorcutt.com/temp/CH%20Ling%20flower>
>>> This is his original
>>> <http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_2166.JPG>
>>>
>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>     
> 
> 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz