Carlos J. Santisteban wrote:
> ...
>
> FWIW, the other "too sharp" lenses I own are:
>
> -R*llei 35's Tessar 40/3.5
>
Hmmm. That's not been my experience with mine. Fairly recently acquired
from a list member, I found the sharpness of my first roll just OK,
nothing to get excited about. And a couple of shots were carefully
measured and set for subject distance.
Nothing to complain about. It certainly takes decent pictures. And I get
to play with a camera than has intrigued me a bit over the years.
Perhaps the difference may be in how the images are prepared and viewed.
Wet darkroom prints, particularly B&W of modest size, are a different
thing than 4000 dpi scans viewed on a computer screen. Seen that way,
mine just don't measure up to a Zuiko 50/1.4.
Or perhaps we simply have samples on opposite ends of the QA curve. :-)
Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|