Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] RANT: Sample images taken with EP-1

Subject: Re: [OM] RANT: Sample images taken with EP-1
From: "Jim Nichols" <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:12:12 -0500
Thanks for the link, Chuck. I now know more than I did before, but much more 
than I deem necessary.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] RANT: Sample images taken with EP-1


> For your edification on CMOS.  Start at page 13.
> <http://www.usa.canon.com/uploadedimages/FCK/Image/White%20Papers/Canon_CMOS_WP.pdf>
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Ken Norton wrote:
>  For
>> example, It isn't any secret that CCDs outperform CMOS in nearly every
>> metric but noise, but since Canon set the rules on noise, everybody had 
>> to
>> go to CMOS to compete in the minds of public opinion.  For we all know 
>> that
>> CMOS chips are all quieter than CCD chips!  CMOS=Good, CCD=Bad.
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
> 


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz