| Subject: | Re: [OM] picture link |
|---|---|
| From: | Dawid Loubser <dawidl@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:13:32 +0200 |
Hmm, my faith is somewhat restored - this looks very acceptable for f/2.8. Now why do you suppose the other f/6.3 example looks so horrible? On 24 Jun 2009, at 6:21 PM, C.H.Ling wrote: > What about this one at F2.8? > > http://pliki.optyczne.pl/ep1/17/foto04.jpg > > C.H.Ling -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Mt McKinkey (Denali) and an Infinity focus question, Lawrence Woods |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] [Resolved] Zuiko 90/2.0 Macro diaphragm spring died??, Dawid Loubser |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] picture link, C.H.Ling |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] picture link, Ken Norton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
