| Subject: | Re: [OM] More on DOF and focal length (by Ctein) |
|---|---|
| From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:32:06 -0400 |
Ummm, Ken, a "zone of in-focus" vs a "plane of in-focus" is called depth of field. :-) Want to try again? I don't think you said what you meant. Chuck Norcutt Ken Norton wrote: > I have noticed over and over again how some modern lenses do not have a > "plane of in-focus" but more of a "zone of in-focus" > > AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/06/2009: red on grey, Ken Norton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] More on DOF and focal length (by Ctein), Chuck Norcutt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] More on DOF and focal length (by Ctein), Chuck Norcutt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] More on DOF and focal length (by Ctein), Ken Norton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |