Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] ( DZ OM ) Value for money?

Subject: Re: [OM] ( DZ OM ) Value for money?
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:07:47 -0400
Read more closely.  The resolution chart is specified in line *pairs* 
per picture height.

And you are perfectly free to continue pursuing artistic aspects. :-)

Chuck Norcutt


Ken Norton wrote:
> Well, I disagree in one aspect. It takes a minimum of twice the sensor
> resolution to maximize lens resolution--and that's when the res chart is
> perfectly aligned with the sensor. What about diagonal details?  Sorry, you
> need much more sensor resolution than what the lens is capable of producing.
> 
> But to what end?  Will I feel inferior at the scenic overlook because I
> don't have a 5Dmk2?  Will I be so distraught over the limitations of my
> equipment that I'll give up photography?
> 
> Nonsense!  If my lowly E-1 can produce nearly perfect 11x14 prints, from a
> resolution perspective, why worry?  Even the E-1 is usually more capable
> than this photographer and the output (prints) are the limiting technology.
> Sure, there are upward limits on how big you can print before the technical
> aspects of the image start to deteriorate, but just maybe I need to focus
> less on technical aspects and more on artistic aspects.
> 
> AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz