Re: [OM] Hi Res film scans on a CD

[Chuck Norcutt]

Thanks, I'm reading the link now.  For some reason clicking on the link 
got everything but the last hyphen so it failed to work the first time.

Chuck Norcutt

usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> I don't know if AG gave Ektar 100 a shot yet or not. I think I would 
> have remembered that.   I recall he was going to order some till a 
> slide work-flow issue took over.
> The Ektar when scanned on the Frontier result in slightly ruddy skin 
> tones---less so than velvia.  The grain in clearely finer than Portra 
> 160VC.
> The ektar does not tolerate underexposure as well as the UC 
> 100--shadows muddy up.  The ektar is very nice but overall I prefer the 
> 100 UC
> for what I need.  It is a moot point as it is no longer made.  There 
> may be many scanner specific issues and spectral sensitivities 
> differences can be eleminated by profiling of course.
> 
> The Portra 400 NC-3 and VC-3 are said to scan well.  I had so much VC-2 
> in the freezer I can't comment yet.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.adorama.com/alc/article/Product-Review-Kodak-Ektar-100-120-Roll-Film-Test-
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This raises the question of which 100 and 400 films today are the best
> for scanning.
> 
> Chuck Noructt
> 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/