Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] [OT] Center filters

Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] Center filters
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:35:45 -0400
Thanks.  I double checked your 90mm on 5x7 = 18mm on 35mm calculation 
since I didn't think off the top of my head that 90mm on 5x7 would be 
quite that wide.  I found the respective angles of coverage to be within 
a fraction of a degree.  :-)

Chuck Norcutt


Dawid Loubser wrote:
> Chuck, the way I understand it, it purely has to do with the distance  
> the light has to travel
> to the film plane (with the symmetrical LF lenses). The Schneider  
> Super-Angulon XL I use (and I suspect
> most modern wide angle LF optics) have a neat trick where the aperture  
> is optically magnified (increasing the apparent size)
> as you move off-axis, it's quite neat to see when looking into the  
> front of the lens.
> 
> However, this still can't account for the fact that the light has to  
> travel more than 2x as far to the corners of
> the film plane, than what it has to the centre. This, and only this,  
> causes the light falloff, and it's this that the
> centre filter tries to correct.
> 
> "Wide Angle" is perhaps a vague term, but I would say consider it  
> similar to 35mm terms, any LF lens which gives you
> an angle of view wider than 35mm or so on an OM could be considered  
> "wide angle" - and I think usually around here you'll
> start getting a bit of light falloff. But only in the super-wides does  
> this become problematic. (90mm is "super-wide"
> on a 5x7in or 6x17cm camera, about as wide as an OM 18mm).
> 
> There are no wide-angle enlarging lenses with an angle of view  
> comparable to the wide-angle lenses available for
> the LF cameras (the widest are about 40mm-equiv in 35mm film terms) so  
> this problem does not exist during
> enlarging. Of course, you can still fit a standard falloff correction  
> lens to the enlarger if you want to
> cause or correct light falloff during printing, I think there are many  
> available.
> 
> The filter that goes on the camera is dark in the centre, to bring the  
> apparent brightness in tune with the corners.
> So, to correct this, you need the opposite filter on your enlarger  
> (one that is dark in the corners, to block
> light in the corners, bringing up the brightness to centre level).
> 
> It's not perfect though, so best is to shoot with the correct filter  
> on the camera. A new Scheinder Centre filter
> alone costs more than a comprehensive OM starter kit (body + couple of  
> lenses) !! But it's perfectly matched
> to the lens, and really high quality.
> 
> I bought my Linhof Technorama 617S for about double of that the centre  
> filter on the lens alone
> would cost me new :-)
> 
> 
> On 20 Jul 2009, at 1:49 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> 
>> Thanks.  What defines wide angle?  Also, if printing large format from
>> an enlarger is there an equivalent center filter that can be applied  
>> to
>> the enlarger lens?
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>> Dawid Loubser wrote:
>>> Hi Chuck,
>>>
>>> Yes, it's very common to use centre filters for all wide-angle large
>>> format
>>> photography, unless you really want extreme dark corners for effect,
>>> or if you're
>>> not shooting colour slide film, which means the darkening is often
>>> corrected during
>>> printing or digitally post-scan.
>>>
>>> I never shoot my 6x17 camera without the centre-filter (well, I did
>>> last weekend for the
>>> first time, still have to see how the images came out).
>>>
>>>
>>> On 20 Jul 2009, at 2:57 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>>
>>>> With all the discussion of 617 cameras today I finally discovered  
>>>> the
>>>> term "center filter".  I had a hunch what it was but verified the
>>>> hunch
>>>> that it was used to control vignetting when I discovered this.
>>>> <http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/149254-REG/Linhof_022302_Center_Filter_95mm_for.html
>>>> This raises a question in my mind whether the use of center  
>>>> filters is
>>>> common in large format photography with wide angle lenses.  After
>>>> all, a
>>>> 6x17cm negative is basically a horizontal 2-1/4" wide slice out of a
>>>> 5x7.  Vignetting tat the corners of a 5x7 negative must be even  
>>>> worse.
>>>>
>>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>> -- 
>>>
>> -- 
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
> 
> 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz