Is the E-3's compression tighter?
> Date: Saturday, July 25, 2009, 10:58 PM
> Hi all,
>
> And thanks to Michael for advice.
>
> My dilemma is this. I have an E-510, and an E-3. Don't ask
> why; I just do,
> now!
>
> When I set the E-510 jpeg image size to largest, fine
> detail, the resultant
> files range in size from 5.000 to 7.500 MB in size.
>
> With the E-3, as far as I can tell the same file
> specification, the file sizes are
> 4.000 to 5.500 MB.
>
> They should be the same size, surely? I have the
> intuitive? impression that
> the E-510 images have greater detail.
>
> I will probably ask these questions at a later time when AG
> is around, but
> right now I'll appreciate helpful comment.
>
> Brian Swale.
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|