Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] ( OM ) Digital landscapes - example

Subject: Re: [OM] ( OM ) Digital landscapes - example
From: Dawid Loubser <dawidl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:47:00 +0200
Thanks, glad you like my (what I though was rather mundane) image :-)

I agree that your upscaled 5D MkII image is not that far off from my  
Mamiya scan, and to answer
your last question/statement, B&W film (Ilford) is a heck of a lot  
more grainy than digital, or
Provia or Ektar colour film. When I scan Provia to the same  
dimensions, there is just absolutely no
(nada, zip) grain. I also find that colour slide film (ISO 100) has  
vastly more resolution than ISO 100
black and white film - not sure why this is? One apparently has to use  
Pan F to match the resolution and (not
even then) the smoothnes of Provia 100F.

I must say, I am thrilled that a scan on a cheap-ish flatbed from my  
Mamiya negatives beat a very high-res
DSLR like the 5DII. However, when you look at a 16x20 wet print from  
this same negative, or a high-end scan
on e.g. a Flextight, it will be some time yet until any one-shot  
digital capture matches it.

However, while the resolution is nice, the sole reason I am messing  
around with B&W is because of the
tonality, I have a carefully made digital capture of that exact same  
scene (EF 50mm f/1.2L at optimum
diffraction-limited aperture, mirror lockup, ESO 1DMkIIN) and the look  
is just totally different, and
I really love wet-printing.

Once it gets old, I am sure I will be thrilled with what contemporary  
digital provides then.

P.S. Your image has again awakened the need within myself to get an OM  
35/2.0 lens! The quality is highly
impressive, I can't believe anybody ever complains about that lens  
being "soft", from what you post, I should be
getting spectacular 9x11in prints from it. Thanks for showing...

On 04 Aug 2009, at 4:00 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:

> Wow! You MF scan is really impressive and the photo itself is very  
> nice. I
> tried to scale up a 5D II image to 7000x4667 it seems not as detail  
> but I
> would say it is not that far away.
>
> Shot with OM 35/2 at F5.6 handheld:
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_5761.JPG (4.8MB)
>
> BTW, if it was not with B/W film will the details be so fine :-)
>
> C.H.Ling


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz