Thanks. Yes, as I commented later, Moose's version had given her
jaundice. Yours is closer but a little too red for this particular girl
who has very pale skin and hair (although her hair has a little bit of
strawberry blond dye streaks in it right now).
So, the same question I gave Moose. What did you do?
C.H.Ling wrote:
> I'm game:
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/temp/photo2.htm
>
> I prefer more mid-tone contrast on the 2nd one. Moose's conversion is a
> little too yellowish to my eyes.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Moose"
>
>> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>> Maybe we don' need no steenkin' flashes. .... As I mentioned not long
>>> ago, this year I decided to try
>>> without fill flash and make up the difference in PhotoShop. Here's what
>>> I've got so far.
>>> <http://www.chucknorcutt.com/Alex%20&%20Caitlin%20-%20August%202009/>
>>>
>> I think more realistic results are possible.
>> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/CNorcutt/img_2646.htm>
>>
>>
>>> ... What's missing for sure is the flash catch lights.
>> To me, losing catch lights is a plus, as it looks more natural.
>>
>>> I'm not sure what if anything I'll do from here but it's certainly
>>> possible I think to do without the flash and make do with
>>> post-processing. Even the shot on the tire in full sun doesn't look too
>>> bad.
>>>
>> Again, I think a more natural result is possible.
>> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/CNorcutt/img_2609.htm>
>>
>> Dr. No Flash d'Moose
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|