But my bet is that the Aperture hi/low adjustment is probably closer to
the true color. The Studio version seems overly saturated to me for the
likely color of the red on the block.
Chuck Norcutt
SwissPace wrote:
> Raw E-3 file as seen by aperture
>
> <http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/gallery/8100207_JddWM#635632039_BxLq5>
>
> Raw E-3 file as seen by olympus studio
>
> <http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/gallery/8100207_JddWM#635621101_HS8jP>
>
> I have normally accepted what aperture gives me in the way of processed
> E-3 files but today I saw that there is a huge difference between what
> it produces and studio, which I particularily noticed today when I
> printed this picture of the engine block. Here I have processed and
> uploaded the file in aperture and olympus studio and as you can see
> there is quite a difference, the most pleasing print came though from
> the studio processed file being printed from within photoshop (no
> modifications), probably some epson colour management going on to help.
>
> What started all this, Chris with his email about imageprint - couldn't
> get it to print, which I was glad about when I saw the price ;-)
>
> So if you use an E-3 consider the olympus studio software as others on
> the list have stated before
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|