Re: [OM] I'm back

[Chuck Norcutt]

Thanks.  I didn't realize that 220 wasn't usable and had forgotten that 
220 didn't have paper backing.

Chuck Norcutt

Brian Swale wrote:
> I'm on the wrong computer to check my membership (and for 2 weeks I'm in 
> the wrong locality to check the old computer), but it would have been after 
> 1995 and only just after the Oben episodes that I joined. Flame wars still 
> occurred sometimes.
> 
> BTW I'm finding it is trickier than anticipated to find subjects suitable for 
> 6x17 negatives; but I'll get there. Fun stuff; a luxurious 4 shots per roll 
> of 120 
> film ( 220 film not usable, since the backing paper is essential); frame 
> boundaries being determined by looking for numbers on the backing paper 
> rolling past through an open hole (glass-less in this case) as in the days of 
> yore (Box Brownie).
> 
> Brian Swale. 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/