Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Zuiko 18 vs. Zeiss et al

Subject: Re: [OM] Zuiko 18 vs. Zeiss et al
From: Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:45:44 -0500
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> How is that possible? The projected geometry of a scene captured
>> by a quarter-area sensor on a 12mm lens (e.g. four thirds) should be
>> exactly the same as a 24mm on an OM?
>>
>> Perhaps you are just inclined to point your four thirds bodies up more?
>> Or you are using your 35mm shift lens :-)
>>
>
> Yes, I'm more inclined to use my OM system more.  ;)
>
> I bring this up because I can't be the only one in the world who has sensed
> this and wondered about it.

Now that you mention it, I have sensed it.

There seems to be more distortion at WA, mainly at the edges, even
when the sensor is squared up to the subject.  However, I am perfectly
open to having someone tell me it's all in my head.

Joel W.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz