Re: [OM] 35mm vs. 28, 24, 21, 20mm

[Joel Wilcox]

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I was surprised that the Olympus OM 35mm f2.8 lens was not easy to find. It
>> is much easier (and cheaper) to find the 28mm and 50mm lenses.
>>
>
>
> Well, I've chatted it up so much that it probably created a global demand
> that outstripped supply.
>
> Not the first time--see 35-80 F2.8, 300 F4.5, 100 F2.8...

Looks like your ego had one of those big Iowa truckstop breakfasts.  ;^)

Joel W.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/