As I said, if the plate is fully seated at the front then it can't
possibly go any lower in the back. I don't think it's constructive to
compare an OM-1 with a different model OM camera and expect that the top
fit should be the same all around. Stop fretting and enjoy the camera.
Chuck Norcutt
DrT (George Themelis) wrote:
>> Looks just like my three other OM-1s and seems perfectly normal to me.
>> Check the front of the top plate. There should be no gap in the front
>> and, if there is none, there's no way the plate can go any lower.
>>
>> I'm curious as to why you thought it abnormal. Do you have another one
>> that doesn't look like that?
>
> There is no gap in the front... I look at other OMs and there seems to be a
> variation. Some show no gap, some show a bit of a gap (mainly on the right
> side - looking from the back). The gap in this one seemed excessive and in
> both sides. The pictures perhaps do not show that but that's the first
> thing I noticed when I examined the camera.
>
> Maybe it is normal...
>
> Thanks Chuck...
>
> George
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|