Hey Carlos: that's my most accurate scan regarding color (I corrected
the purple chroma of the 85~250 at 250, on the white stripes in the
background only, where they were very noticeable).
Trans illuminated using a 60W solar tungsten GE lamp, white acrylic
until I find a better diffuser.
It's aged Velvia 50, Chris, remember!.
Seems it's all about monitor calibration: so far I've done so
following lagom.com and then, loaded aRGB - I've discussed this long
with Carlos: in a Mac monitor, if you load aRGB @ 6500 (D65) and gamma
2.2, you shall see darker colors than those I see in a windows monitor
with the same settings ...., of course, NikonScan has a built-in aRGB,
so it 'should' be able to cover such a space -'though the raw (no
curves, levels, LCH, USM at scanning stage) files I get have a blue
cast. Tried doing so with KM settings, not blue but magenta-red cast.
Last week I found a 12 ink cartridge _big_ Canon printer in
Montevideo: shall see.
I'm working in my most difficult scan now: one I call 'Intersky'. When
ready, I'll upload it.
Oooopsss - must go to work ... Carlos: interesting question, is Oct 12
a holiday in Spain ? ;-)
I'll write you later ...
Fernando.
2009/10/12 Carlos J. Santisteban <zuiko21@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> <http://www.flickr.com/photos/fernando_gonzalez_gentile/3986509090/sizes/o/>
>
>
> From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>>Yes, very good, Fernando. The colours in your photos are sometimes a
>
>>little strong, but this is an interesting set of colours as well as
>
>>composition.
>
>
> Maybe because he insists on using the "wrong" colour space? :-) :-) :-)
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|