Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(

Subject: Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:43:31 -0400
Hmmm.  So does mine.  But it also introduces discussion of raw files 
with this heading in the manual:  "About the RAW"

I have tended to discount translated Japanese technical manuals as 
models of English language usage.  :-)

Chuck Norcutt


Philippe Amard wrote:
> 
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> 
>> Except that there is no custom development option that could exercise 
>> even a fraction of the control allowed by processing raw files in a raw 
>> converter.
>>  
>>
> why except? this is what I had thought I was metaphoring  :-[
> 
>> ps:  I think I've asked it here before but I continuously wonder why 
>> nearly everyone (but me) writes raw as RAW... as though it's an acronym 
>> or file type abbreviation.  It's neither, just an adjective.
>>
>>  
>>
> Orf?
> ;-)
> 
> my camera spells RAW with capitalized letters, so dAWs the Mac, and 
> WindAWs also  ...
> ph
> 
> 
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> Philippe Amard wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> In short :
>>> Shooting RAW is more or less like developing the film the way you want 
>>> it to be.
>>> Shooting JPEG is asking the first lab or shop round the corner to 
>>> process it for you.
>>>
>>> No printing involved here.
>>> Ph
>>>
>>>
>>> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>> Joel's statement about not needing to shoot raw when you have a live 
>>>> histogram is correct... but only if your intent is to replicate shooting 
>>>> slide film.  There are dozens of controls on ACR's conversion screens 
>>>> and exposure is but one of them.  When processing raw files (basically 
>>>> everything I shoot) I probably deliberately set no less than 1/2 dozen 
>>>> controls and for some as many as a dozen or more.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps this points to the source of the sometimes quite divergent views 
>>>> on shooting raw.  Not shooting raw and not having extensive control over 
>>>> the development process would be quite constraining for me.
>>>>
>>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ken Norton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      
>>>>
>>>>>> There is no need to shoot RAW in such a case if exposure
>>>>>> is the primary reason for doing so.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>
>>>>>>          
>>>>>>
>>>>> Funny how some of us can manage to shoot slide film and get the exposure
>>>>> right, but the moment we pick up a digital camera--gotta shoot RAW because
>>>>> we can't meter to save our skin.
>>>>>
>>>>> AG
>>>>>   
>>>>>
>>>>>        
>>>>>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz