Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?

Subject: Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?
From: "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:11:32 +0800
Excellent explanation, I have the same feeling but just don't know how to 
express it.
C.H.Ling


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Norton"

> Personally, I would like the tonal adjustment to be turned down a notch.
> The control only goes to 10 and this one looks to be set on 12.  I
> understand that this adjustment is for illustration purposes so it is
> exaggerated a bit, but it does represent one thing I find most grating to
> me.  The clouds look too crunchy with the amount of highlight recovery 
> done
> on the image. This is not only unnatural but doesn't even remotely look
> comfortable.  The clouds, when processed that way, snap and pop in the 
> scene
> giving that "wow factor" when you first see the image, but the image then
> becomes old in a real hurry.
>
> But what about Ansel Adams pictures?  Aren't they the same way?  Yes, they
> are.  In fact, I also crunch the snot out of the clouds in my B&W pictures
> too, but there is one very important difference:
>
> B&W images are abstract by their very nature. The fact that they are 
> already
> abstract means that you have freedom to bend reality a bit without
> disturbing the viewer.
>
> Color images, on the other hand, are not abstract by their very nature, 
> but
> can be made to be abstract when you remove the tonal point-of-reference.
>
> The tonal point-of-reference in this image is the sky.  Everybody, except
> those in the UK, know what a blue sky looks like. It is firmly ingrained 
> in
> our visual processing centers. When we look at a photograph like this we
> instantly calibrate our vision to the point-of-reference, which is the 
> blue
> sky. We know in our minds what clouds are supposed to look like.
> Unfortunately, a highly processed image like this has the clouds moved too
> far down the tonal scale in relation to what the mind knows is correct.
>
> What if?  What if you were to tightly crop the image on only one cloud and
> process it heavily. Is that OK?  Yes it is, because the point-of-reference
> (blue sky and other known objects) have been removed.  Once you remove 
> those
> elements, you end up with an abstract image which is this free game for
> artistic intent.
>
> AG

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz