| Subject: | Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film |
|---|---|
| From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:01:08 -0400 |
Yes, yes, no. Chuck Norcutt Ken Norton wrote: >> But I already have the computer. >> >> > Do you have a computer capable of adequately handling your next camera? How > about the software? Paid your Adobe Tax lately? > > AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Marc Lawrence |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, John Hudson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Ken Norton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Chuck Norcutt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |