Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics

Subject: Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics
From: Jim Couch <zuikoholic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:58:18 -0700
Andrew,

How is the 'speed' in handling, startup, auto focus, ect. In all honesty 
I can usually live with the small sensor IQ, it's the damn slow handling 
that gets me with the compacts.

Jim Couch

Andrew Fildes wrote:
> I'm just playing with a new Sony TX-1 compact - got it to try out the  
> robot cradle that goes with it. Not too impressed by that (slow,  
> uncertain) but do like the 'sweep panorama' mode - just set the mode  
> and swing around with the camera - it takes a series and then stitches  
> them automatically. You have a choice of standard or wide - think 4:1  
> and 7:1.
> Small sensor quality but fast and you can keep redoing it to get it  
> right and it's real pano - swing not letterbox.
> I'm just stunned by the computing power involved to stitch and trim -  
> couple of seconds to take and 3-4 more to process - in a tiny handbag'  
> camera! Results are not at all bad with a tweak in Lightroom - bump  
> the clarity and vibrance, sharpen a bit and use a gradient filter to  
> correct lighting. I'll put some up soon.
> Now that the megapixel race is over, I think we're going to see some  
> clever features showing up.
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On 28/10/2009, at 3:50 PM, Moose wrote:
>
>   
>> Richard Man wrote:
>>     
>>> Vertical are challenging but can be a lot of fun...
>>>
>>> "Must Be 29"
>>> http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/PICS/20091023-126.jpg
>>>
>>>       
>> Very nice capture ad great use of the panorama for vertically.
>>
>> I don't quite 'get' the tonality. 'Twere mine, it would look more like
>> this. <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Man/20091023-126.htm>
>>
>> Can't decide if I like it as is or with perspective "corrected".
>>
>>     
>>> Bicycles
>>> http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/PICS/20091023-127.jpg
>>>
>>>       
>> Not as dramatic, but still good use of the form to see some thing
>> differently. Again, I'd use different tonality, which incidentally  
>> adds
>> a bit of visual drama.
>> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Man/20091023-127.htm>
>>
>> Moose
>> -- 
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
>>     
>
>   
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz