Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 250/2

Subject: Re: [OM] 250/2
From: Hughes <hi100@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 01:18:21 -0800 (PST)
I haven't really followed this thread too closely so not sure exactly what kind 
of pics were requested.   
Jan Steinman, an old list member did some field tests on various long lenses + 
TC's.   
 
Unfortunately per your original request for pics, it does not include pics for 
the 250/2, although  it includes many other long OM lenses, as well as some 3rd 
party lenses:
 
http://www.bytesmiths.com/OM_Tele/index.html
 
Tim Hughes
 


--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Dawid Loubser <dawidl@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Dawid Loubser <dawidl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OM] 250/2
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 3:55 AM


On 04 Nov 2009, at 12:36 PM, Tim Hughes wrote:

> The focusing, for tracking any kind of moving target, is terrible  
> on  the 300/4.5 though.
> I wish they had brought out a later, internal focusing variant of  
> one  of the small 200mm / 300mm lenses.
>>>
>
> The Novoflex follow focus lenses work

<snip> Blah blah blah

Yes, but *where are the 250/2.0 sample images*, people??

:-)

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz