Thanks Wayne, I am certainly well aware of that.
You may have picked up that I enjoy shallow DOF, but I have no illusions
of ever achieving that from a quarter-area sensor camera.
Still, why I wish they would introduce said lenses, is to make up for
the
poorer high-ISO performance, and to produce an overall more flexible
photographic
tool which would not get slaughtered when Canon/Nikon etc. finally get
onto
this bandwagon, which they surely will (be forced to by the market).
I wish Olympus had done better. But our hopes must lie in a manufacturer
such as Cosina/Voigtlander, who might maybe one day start designing
lenses specifically for the Micro Four Thirds mount.
Otherwise, aesthetics of the big ugly finder aside, the E-P2 looks
quite nice.
Just not the small professional tool I would have liked to see,
personally.
regards,
Dawid
On 05 Nov 2009, at 11:46 AM, Wayne Harridge wrote:
> Dawid,
>
> Keep in mind that for the same DOF on 4/3 you need a lens that is 2
> stops
> faster than the equivalent f/l in ff 35mm. So in your case for
> ff=90mm f2,
> you need 4/3=45mm f1 - don't hold your breath.
>
> ...Wayne
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|