I notice that some of us when writing an URL which points to a jpeg image,
their URL ends in ...jpg.htm or ..jpg.html
My understanding of web language is that adding either <.htm> or <.html>
is superfluous, and that <.jpg> is quite sufficient.
Am I correct, or has there been a change in standards that I missed?
Brian Swale.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|