Thanks, Mike. That's the conclusion I came to, but I was willing to
give them a try. I think I'm stuck with the rather odd SilkyPix for
my LX3, since I'm unwilling to upgrade to PS CS4.
I should have researched the camera better for use with the Mac, but
it is really the most delightful little thing that takes rather smart
photos.
And I referred to you as "Bob" in my reply to Jim just now. Sorry; I
wasn't thinking of "Bob" in the Black Adder episode, but of an Army
officer I once knew of that name, Bob Usher :-).
Chris
On 8 Nov 2009, at 22:38, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> I see no evidence that they support the LX3 with a dedicated module
> anyway. I doubt very much it is worth an Adobe tax and
> a DXO tax w/o raw support and automatic correction of aberrations with
> deconvolution as well. They only support a few
> fixed lens cams. The new way of finding them on their site is a pain.
> They had a comprehensive list of all cams and lenses supported
> until recently--list became cumbersome to check perhaps. They do
> support the G9, G10 and will support the G11 soon.
>
> Watching the forum now and again they often have a few problems with
> compatability esp with a new version and esp with 64 bit OS. Their
> optics
> Ph.D's are good but tight coding/interface has not been a strong
> point.
> Ver 6.1 and 6.2 will be better.
> It would be interesting to see how they did with the new Oly modules.
>
> Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|