Re: [OM] Separated Zuiko 250/2, was: Inside the Zuiko 300mm F4.5

[Chuck Norcutt]

Because David Loubser started raising lots of questions about the 250/2 
about 10 days ago.  No one ventured the same level of interest in the 
350/2.8.  I didn't even know there was such a lens.

Chuck Norcutt

Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
> Why does the list comment so much related to the 250/2, and not so
> much on the 350/2.8?
> 
> Just curious ...
> 
> Fernando.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/