Thanks Carlos.
I bought the 7-14 Oly because I missed (U)WAs on the 4/3.
As you state it, long is no problem, I have successfully mounted Leica
and Angenieux zooms (70-210).
Also I started with the Oly 70-300 and went to the 50-200 to gain some
definition and light.
But my widest was climited to the 14-50 delivered with the camera.
So I succumbed the temptation even though I had thought the G1 and micro
7-14 could be a lot cooler.
But I have no experience with it.
And I'm curious to know about the micro 7-14 too.
Anyone has samples photos to share?
BTW; I bought my son a G1 and I find it a really pleasant piece of
equipment - I haven't yet ordered adaptors for the C..n, Le..a , Pet..x
or Angénieux lenses I have on my shelves, but will end up doing so I guess.
Thanks for viewing.
Phx
Carlos J. Santisteban wrote:
>Hi Philippe, Ken and all,
>
>From: Philippe Amard <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
>
>
>><
>>
>>
>http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Angels/Engelberg-Angels--1130846.jpg.html
>
>
>
>Beautiful picture and a great use of ultra-wides -- not always easy!
>
>From: Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>>Oooh. Nice tonalities! Not shabby at all for digital!
>>
>>
>
>LOL!!! But I do agree with the beauty of the tonalities.
>
>From: Philippe Amard <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
>
>
>>Thanks Ken,
>>Oly glass rules ;-)
>>
>>
>
>So I assume it's the Oly 7-14/4... now I feel some increased "wide-angle
>desire" with my GF-1 -- the tele section is well covered via adapters ;^)
>I'm thinking about the Lumix 7-14/4, but in micro-four-thirds mount. Anyone
>here has any experience with it?
>
>BTW, nice pictures in the rest of your gallery, too.
>
>Cheers,
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
