Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot

Subject: Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot
From: Jez Cunningham <jez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:14:06 +0100
75%?  Interesting definitions here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Types_of_chocolate (if you believe wikipaedia)
In .be land we plenty of the real stuff.
Jez

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Piers Hemy <piers@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yes!  That which has less than 75% cacao is not chocolate.  And if you
> fellow Brits look carefully at the next bar of Cadbury's Dairy Milk, you
> will not find any refernece to chocolate thereon!  Some would say that is
> because it contains "caca" instead of "cacao".
>
> Piers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: philippe.amard [mailto:philippe.amard@xxxxxx]
> Sent: 15 December 2009 13:31
> To: Olympus Camera Discussion
> Subject: Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot
>
>
> Le 15 déc. 09 à 14:15, Jez Cunningham a écrit :
>
> >
> > I think you mean dark chocolate...
>
> or, chocolate?
>
> ph
>
> --snip
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz