Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Where's Moosie? [was G11 review [was Before you go, Moose ...]

Subject: Re: [OM] Where's Moosie? [was G11 review [was Before you go, Moose ...]]
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:42:11 -0500
Then I stand corrected but insist that I actually had it right since 
"you" very clearly includes the processing.  Just hidden from us in 
these cases.  And the fact that it's hidden is a good testament as well.

Chuck Norcutt


Moose wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> You and the camera did very well 
> 
> Thanks, although processing played a big part, as well.
> 
>> but I still would have dragged the shutter.  
> 
> No argument. Undoubtedly you would have :-) .
> 
>> It would have improved the majority of the shots and not made much 
>> difference to others.
>>   
> 
> Here I may differ. You are looking at processed shots with an "artistic" 
> or "whatever" intent on my part. The majority of the portrait shots have 
> had the background reduced in brightness to reduce distracting elements 
> and quite a few have had the immediate foreground reduced to balance 
> with the primary subjects. These shots were taken and processed for the 
> enjoyment of those there, and so focus on their subjects.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz