On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Joel, I was immediately excited about your post because I thought you got
> new audio monitors. Then I saw that it was just a new computer display.
>
> Then you wrote:
>
>> The monitor is quite a revelation. I've not experienced anything quite as
>> good as
>> what I am now seeing with it. Much better for critical work, to say the
>> least!
>>
>
> So, I'm excited all over again. I'm probably going to replace my aging
> laptop with a desktop computer of some form and a decent display is on the
> agenda. I don't like being a copycat, as you all are well aware of, but if
> this turns out to be a good monitor, I might be tempted to steal from my
> camera fund to subsidize the computer fund.
So far so good, Ken. As you know, I am also breaking in an Epson
1400. My experience in the past has been that with careful profiling
of both monitor and printer, the monitor will be close to the printer
output. I think it is not likely that printed output will be quite as
fine as what I'm seeing on this monitor, but stay tuned on that.
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|