Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OMG! (not OM-G)

Subject: Re: [OM] OMG! (not OM-G)
From: Jim Couch <zuikoholic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 16:15:35 -0800
I am with Andrew here. In fact I rarely see movies much anymore, it's 
not the cost, it's the time. Special effects, great filming, ect are all 
like pretty wrapping paper and bows on an empty box if the story is not 
worthwhile. Not worth my time.

Jim Couch

Andrew Fildes wrote:
> If that means it's tacky, maudlin, cliché-ridden, obvious,  
> predictable, weak, derivative, fatuous, two-dimensional <g> and aimed  
> at the lowest possible common denominator...yup.
> Frankly, I get very angry when a filmmaker treats me with such obvious  
> disrespect.
> For me, the narrative is paramount.
> Style must never become more  important than function.
>
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz