I'm not sure what that analogy means, Joel. I've re-read what I wrote and then
read this latest passage of yours and I'm lost.
So, I shall go and make some photos tomorrow with my E-3: some jpgs with
gradation set to, say, Vivid, and some RAWs with the same setting, then some
RAWs with Neutral. I'll then import them to Aperture and see if there is a
difference.
Chris
On 15 Jan 2010, at 15:15, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'm only guessing, Joel, partly based on what we have discussed before on
>> the List.
>>
>> The application in which you open the RAW file must make assumptions about
>> how to present the image. From what you say, and it sounds logical, Studio
>> and Master take account of the image settings in the Oly camera, perhaps the
>> ones used to generate a jpg. Without having checked, I supposed that
>> Aperture doesn't even see these settings, but makes a guess at how it should
>> be presented for viewing and subsequent processing. I should say that
>> Aperture treats all RAW files the same when making a preview and that's what
>> I mean by "neutral".
>>
>> What do you think? I shall do some experiments with jpg and RAF files in an
>> E-3 over the weekend.
>
> I think it might be like saying that a Pentax lens on an E-system
> camera via adapter is more neutral than a DZ because the DZ applies AF
> and aperture settings.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|